Maritim Low Uomo

...Ich selbst habe 44,5 im Durchschnitt bei vielen Marken, abgesehen Wanderschuhe 45,5 oder bzw wie angegossen wäre 44 ...und damit zu klein.So hatte ich die in 45 bestellt, davon ausgehend, dass bei denen nur dünne Socken und etwas Luft dazwischen passen müssen.Aber 45 sitzt wie angegossen und das würde sehr schmerzhaft werden.45,5 gab es wo in der Tabelle, aber nirgends zu kaufen. Daher nun Neukauf und die 46 testen.Der schützende Sohlengummi an den Seiten ist etwas niedrig außen und das Profil ist für Gelände etwas zu Sneaker flach.Wie das im bergigen Dschungel gehen soll, mal testen... aber ich bin skeptisch.Warum nur so eine Entwicklung?! Produktionskosten sparen, damit das Wüstenmodell beinahe gleich ist?Das Grau könnte etwas dunkler sein für City-Ausgehschuhanwendung auf Reisen. Nach dreckiger Anwendung... das würde mehr Nutzung weg kaschieren.Man hat schließlich nicht zig paar Schuhe im Backpack.

Went into the sea, came ashore, did some battle completely soaked, got sand in every cavity of my body, but the boots were already dry. Went to a forest, heat was terrible, other guys with standard issue boots were whining, but I felt like I had just started my epic day walking on a teddy bear. Yes, they are that comfortable. Doesn't protect from a 10kg rock falling on your foot though. But at least you're comfy and dry when it does happen.

I really like these shoes, my second pair. Make sure to order wider than expected, at least in my foot shape it made a huge difference.I get lots of comments on them as they are not your typical shoe, they clean up nice, let my feet breath, and are comfortable to wear all day standing.Will be getting another pair, just wish they had more color combos.

So I love Chuck Taylors. I wear red high tops every day. However, I work in an office and the shoes are good for sitting and periodic standing. Anything more and my feet need more support.I always wanted Converse to make tactical chucks, but the closest I was able to get were Converse combat boots.Apparently the guys at Altama had seen the pictures of Special Forces soldiers in Vietnam sporting Chucks, ranger panties, and an XM177 carbine. Or perhaps they realized that Chucks are still in use as approach shoes and lightweight sneakers when combat boots might raise suspicions.While Nike hinted at more hardcore Chucks at the end of last year, they do not hold a candle to these suckers.Most of the stuff you can see from the pictures, but here's some highlights I liked.1. The outsoles are made of the same plastic that my climbing shoes are, and are grippy even when wet.2. The design flaws seen on original chucks have been remedied. The banding around the outsole and upper have been sewn on to prevent premature separation. They have also cut the banding at the flex point to prevent the typical tearing (although it is supposedly actually to allow your foot to push water out of the shoe.So how do the shoes perform? Pretty good. They are light. They have more padding on the tongue and upper than chucks; something I'm not the biggest fan of, but helps. They do well in the water, and they do in fact work well with fins. I'm no high speed low drag UTD diver, but I do like the idea of a shoe that I can wear into the water, slap fins on, and then walk out of the water later. No need to stop and take off wet suit boots after a dive, you just walk ashore and keep going like a boss. The cut on the back of the high tops allow for full flex of the ankle with fins on. They worked well in my dive and I didn't have to change shoes at all that day.Good to finally see tactical Chuck Taylors. Would highly recommend.

The shoes are very nice. The fit is not so good because they run narrow. I would like to see the shoes offered in Wide.